1. As to the Defendant B’s grounds of appeal, the lower court convicted Defendant B of the part of the charges regarding Defendant B’s bid interference.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of the

2. As to the grounds of appeal by Defendant F, the lower court convicted Defendant F of the facts charged against Defendant F (excluding the part not guilty in the grounds of appeal) on the grounds as indicated in its reasoning

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of the crime of acceptance of bribe and the admissibility of evidence.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.