beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.06.28 2015고단3220

재물손괴등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 3, 2014, the Defendant was the victim D and the victim E, and on June 3, 2014, the Incheon District Court of the Incheon District Court filed and continued the extradition suit against the father G2 level G in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, the Defendant was living in the above residence with the victims since 2008. The deceased on June 10, 2015, and the victims went into the residence of the victims, removed all the articles of the victims, and then rented the above residence to gain rent.

1. On June 13, 2015, the Defendant infringed upon the residence of the victims by allowing the employees of the removed company to enter the said residence through the cargo lifts in order to remove the goods, etc. located in the said residence, and allowing the said employees to open the entrance door and to enter the said residence of the victims.

2. The Defendant damaged property by requiring the H president I, staffJ et al., who may know of the fact at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, to attach or dismantle three unrefluent decorations in the market price owned by the victims in the above residence, and to dispose of them, such misfluences and food, food and food, television one, a laundry, a laundry, a laundry, a laundry, a laundry, a laundry, a laundry, a video display, etc. in the above funeral.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of K Witness;

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Statement made to K in the police statement;

1. Investigation report (Listening to the unclaimed L’s statement), investigation report ( listening to the victim’s statement related to the damaged field), (Entry in a complaint stating that the victims resided in the above residence and the defendant was damaged by intrusion on the above residence, and the witness M’s legal statement constitutes professional evidence that M has taken up from K, and thus, shall not be admitted as evidence;

Defendant

Judgment on the Defense Counsel's argument

1. Intrusion upon a house;