2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is establishing and operating a “C Council member” (hereinafter “instant Council member”) in Gangnam-gu Seoul and fourth floors.

B. Around March 2016, the Defendant conducted a field investigation (hereinafter “instant field investigation”) with respect to the instant member by setting the period during which “from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015” was to be investigated (hereinafter “instant field investigation”).

C. On September 27, 2018 based on the results of the instant on-site investigation, the Defendant calculated and collected the medical care benefit cost to the Plaintiff on an accurate basis. However, in the case of a certain number of persons, the Defendant: (a) administered the East Asian Marama, 1, 199, 44, 200, 205, 200, 294, 173, 164, 176, 167, 207, 207, 206, 174, 167, 206, 17, 207, 164, 167, 17, 206, 206, 17, 206, 200, 176, 206, 37, 206, 37, 206, 206, 206, 37, etc. of the Plaintiff’s argument.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion lies in the students who were suffering from diseases related to sexual life, such as sexual communicable diseases, such as the power plant and sexual communicable diseases.

They did not disclose their personal information to the public health insurance because they did not want to have their own information on disease and treatment as a medical record, or requested the plaintiff to do so strongly.

The treatment of non-benefit of the instant council members was conducted by C, who is the father of the Plaintiff, at the time of the operation of the instant council members, and the Plaintiff could not immediately alter the practice formed by C.

If the instant disposition is not revoked, the Plaintiff.