2. Although the defendant's mistake is divided, there are several times of punishment by fine and imprisonment with prison labor. In particular, even during the period of repeated crime as stated in the judgment of the court below, there is an inevitable reason for the corresponding punishment when committing each of the crimes of this case, and the corresponding punishment is committed in light of each of the crimes of this case. Although the victim I does not want punishment but want to do so, damage recovery has not been made to victims until the trial of the case. In full view of all the sentencing data on the records of this case including the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, etc., the court below's punishment is appropriate and too unreasonable and too unreasonable.

3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeals are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, since it is obvious that the "paragraph (1)" of the third hyp of the judgment of the court below is a clerical error in the "paragraph (2)", it shall be corrected in accordance with Article 25 of the Rules