The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the judgment, in light of the court below’s reasoning, the court below was just in finding the Defendant guilty of both the violation of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal. The court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules. The court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence against the logical and empirical rules.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.