부당이득금반환
1. The judgment of the first instance, including a claim modified at the trial, shall be modified as described in paragraph 2.
2. The plaintiff, Ga.
1. The following facts may be acknowledged in full view of the following facts: (a) each of the evidence Nos. 1, 9, 11, 13, 35 and 38 (if the above Defendants have a serial number, including its serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the fact inquiry with respect to the J, L, L, M, and N under Article 257(1) of the Civil Procedure Act; (b) and the purport of the entire pleadings in the first instance trial as a result of the fact inquiry with respect to the U.S. High Court Goyang branch.
Land listed in the annexed Table 1 (hereinafter referred to as land in this case, and the remaining land listed in the annexed list is also specified in the annexed table. In addition, “each of the land in this case” is referred to as “S [DA] by the owner of the land in this case, who is not related to the issues in this case, although some of the land in the course of division has a little difference in the size of the land in the course of division, the name of satisfaction compensation shall be disregarded because it is irrelevant to the issues in this case]. The owner of the land in this case is described as “SB and DC,” respectively, and the third party owner of the land in the land investigation register in the Japanese colonial occupation shall be described as “D.”
B. As to the land No. 1 of this case, the registration of preservation of ownership for each 1/6 portion in the name of DE, T, BV, DF, AZ, or DG was completed on November 10, 1970 by Act No. 2111 of May 21, 1969 and repealed on December 19, 2008) and there was a change of rights as indicated below.
As to the land No. 1 of this case, the State paid the land compensation to Defendant B, C, and D, who is the nominal owner on the registry at the time of each agreement acquisition as follows.
1/6 of the status of registration of ownership transfer (the cause of registration) transfer (the receipt of ownership compensation) 1/6 of the DH state (purchase) - T State (consultation acquisition) 1/6 111,33,00 - BV Defendant B state (sale) 1/6,000 1/6,09,695,750 received DF AG (donation).