beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.06.19 2018고단262

위조공문서행사등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 25, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution and one year of observation of the forgery of official documents, etc. at the Seo-gu District Court Branch Branch (2016, 2250, etc.) on October 25, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 3, 2016. However, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor from the Seo-gu District Court Branch (hereinafter referred to as the above repeated crime) on January 17, 2017 due to recidivism during the period of observation of the above protection (hereinafter referred to as the "Seoul District Court Branch Branch") and the sentence of suspension of execution was revoked on October 17, 2017 (Seoul District Court Branch Branch Branch 2017 early 450). On January 19, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny and for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 17, 2018.

1. On May 23, 2016, at the D mobile phone sales store located in Daegu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant presented a letter of confirmation to apply for issuance of a resident registration certificate under the name of the head of Dong F, Seo-gu, Seoul-gu, Seoul-gu, Seoul-gu, one of which the Defendant had forged, to G, and exercised it.

2. Around May 23, 2016, the Defendant entered “E”, “H” in the column of the applicant’s name, “H” in the State column, and “Tgu-si, Daegu-si,” with the signature of “E” on the paper of a new contract for the SK Telecom Services kept at the said D mobile phone retail store for the purpose of uttering at the said D mobile phone sales store. On the other hand, the Defendant forged one copy of the new contract for the SK Telecom Services in the name of E, which is a private document on the rights and obligations, and displayed it to G.

As above, the Defendant received 7 mobile phone jumal jumal juthy from the victim G by deceiving the victim G, which is equivalent to KRW 968,00 on the same day, from the victim G, and had the victim pay KRW 1,006,470 from May 23, 2016 to November 21, 2017, without paying KRW 1,006,470 from November 23, 2017, and acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A complaint filed by G;