A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, for eight months, and for six months, for Defendant C, respectively.

except that this shall not apply.

1. The Defendants committed the crime of joint intimidation by Defendant A and Defendant B stated, around 01:20 on January 16, 2014, the “Fjuk point” in the operation of the victim E (the 40-year old-old) located in Ansan-gu (the 40-year-old). The Defendant reported the 112 report, and the victim reported the 112 report, and the Defendant A appears to be “the victim considered to have been able to drink the 10-year-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-old-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out-out

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly threatened the victim.

2. Defendant B and Defendant C’s crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties on the street above the “Fju shop” as referred to in the preceding paragraph, around January 16, 2014, around 01:35, 112 as the foregoing case, asked the police officer who was called out after having received 112 report as to the foregoing case, and walked once with the back part of the HH new-use vehicle of G driving where A maed from the mash, and then he saw that G attempted to make an objection against A.

As a result, the Gyeongyangan Police Station GJ affiliated with the I District Gyeongyangan Police Station was removed, Defendant B expressed to J that “this few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few)

As a result, the Defendants jointly interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the 112-report handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of J, K and G;

1. E;