However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From June 5, 2017 to July 19:15, 2017, the Defendant was equipped with 5 smuggling and other facilities inside the Magro-type 40 square meters operated by Defendant’s government-si B and 3-type 3-type Maro-type Maro-type 3-type Maro-type 40 square meters. The Defendant received 1.20,000 won from unspecified customers in return for sexual traffic, and had female employees and sexual intercourse with Thailand-type D.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Scenic photographs;

1. Copy of the passport;

1. Price list;

1. Report on internal investigation (with respect to the details of crackdown and the statement of the suspected suspect);

1. Investigation report (as to the statement of female employees):

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a bankbook and a detailed statement of deposit transactions;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Protective observation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. One month to seven years from imprisonment with prison labor within the applicable range of punishment by law; and

2. The scope of the recommended punishment on the sentencing guidelines [the types of decisions] the basic area [the scope of the recommended punishment] of the types 2 (the brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic by business, receipt and payment of prices, etc.] (the determination of the recommended area] of the types of sexual traffic crimes subject to the age of 19 or older, such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic, etc.

3. The defendant, who was sentenced to a sentence, sees his wrong and reflects his attitude to avoid repeating the sentence.

In addition, the punishment shall be determined within the scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing criteria by comprehensively taking into account the various circumstances shown in the arguments in this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, period and scale of the crime, circumstances before and after the crime, and the record of