However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 00:20 on September 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 112 reported by the Defendant that the Defendant frighted and frighted on the roads prior to Osan City B; and (b) frighted from the victim D(h) of the police officer affiliated with the Modong Police Station C police station in the Sungdong-dong Police Station called the Defendant, the Defendant expressed the police officer called “fright h. h. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f.

Since then, the Defendant committed assaulting the victim's left side bridge by shouldering the victim's left side.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases, and at the same time, the Defendant left a room requiring approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the department reporting the 112 Incident, photographs, and written diagnosis of injury;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The grounds for sentencing in Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution do not apply to regular concurrent crimes with the reasons for sentencing.

The crime of this case is deemed to have committed the crime of this case by exercising violence and causing injury to a police officer who is performing legitimate duties; the nature of the crime is not good; the damage of the victim was not recovered; the victim did not reach an agreement with the victim; the confession of the crime of this case is against the victim; the first offender is deemed to have committed the crime of this case by drinking.