(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. From October 24, 2013, the above real estate.

On March 30, 2013, the Plaintiff, the owner of the real estate indicated in the list (hereinafter “instant real estate”) leased the instant real estate to the Defendant on March 30, 2013 by setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 20 million, KRW 1,000,000 per month, and the period from March 30, 2013 to March 30, 2015. The Defendant did not pay the remainder of the rent to the Plaintiff by the end of August 2014, with the payment of KRW 680,000 to March 30, 2015. The fact that the Plaintiff terminated the lease due to the Defendant’s delinquency in rent, etc. is either disputed between the parties or may be recognized by comprehensively taking into account the purport of the entire pleadings as stated in the evidence No. 1.

According to the above facts, since 6,800,000 won that the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff falls under the rent from March 30, 2013 to October 23, 2013, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff upon return of the leased object following the termination of the lease contract, and to pay the Plaintiff the rent and the amount of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent calculated at the rate of KRW 1,00,000 per month from October 24, 2013 to the completion date of delivery of the instant real estate.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remainder is dismissed as there is no ground.