2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 10, 2016, the Defendant: “C(B)” located in Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul on March 10, 2016, and the facts charged in the indictment of the Victim D Co., Ltd. were “F” as the victim’s “F; however, F is merely the representative of the victim’s company. By inserting cash (debris) in the end of the end of the end of the end of the horse managed by the Defendant, the Defendant normally filled up “Nexman Capital.”

그런 데 E 시스템 오류로 인하여 넥슨캐시가 충전이 되지 않은 것으로 인식이 되어 단 말기 화면에 환불 받을 계좌를 입력 하라고 하자, 위 피고인은 넥슨캐시가 정상적으로 충전이 된 사실을 알았음에도 충전금액을 환불 받기 위해 자신이 예금 주인 하나은행 계좌 (G )를 부정하게 입력하여 컴퓨터 등 정보처리장치인 E 시스템 공소장의 공소사실에는 E ‘ 단 말기’ 가 정보처리를 하는 것으로 기재되어 있으나, 증거에 의하면 E 중앙 서버 등 시스템이 정보처리를 하는 것으로 판단되는 바, 피고인의 방어권 보장에 실질적 불이익이 없으므로 공소장변경절차 없이 이와 같이 인정한다.

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

By making this information processing, the amount of charging was deposited into the account by receiving refund from the damaged party.

From that time until March 14, 2016, the Defendant received a total of KRW 1,441,000 from the account transfer to the account transfer and acquired property benefits.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of transaction date and receipt of account transfer details;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 347 of the choice of punishment (a comprehensive determination of fines);

2. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

3. The criminal procedure of the provisional payment order is identical to the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, but the injury is recovered, etc.