However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a space between the victim C (n, 47 years of age) and the victim from August 2012 to January 2013.

1. On January 6, 2013, from around 16:00 to 18:30 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) found the victim’s “E” head chloak point in Ansan-si, Ansan-si; (b) found the victim’s hinginging to the hing to the hing to the hing to the hing part of the hing part of the hing part of the hing part of the hing part of the hing part of the hing part of the hing part of the hing part of the hing part of the hing part of the hing part of the hing part of the hing part of the hing part of the hing part of the hing part of the hing part of the hing part of the hing part of the hing part of the hing part of the hing part of the hing part of the h

The Defendant, by force, interfered with the victim’s chropsing business for about 2 hours and 30 minutes.

2. At around 18:30 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the entrance door of the victim, which was far from the opening of the door at the above “E,” and destroyed the glass door by fasting his shoulder door several times; and (b) invaded the building managed by the victim by entering the door.

3. On January 27, 2013, the Defendant, at the above “E” around January 27, 2013, destroyed the back door door door glass and loss thereby undermining the utility of the pro rata property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement related to C, F, and G;

1. Each statement of H and I;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to records of the case-related photograph, site photograph, and field record of the case

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The fact that Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act reflects the error of the defendant, the fact that the defendant made a smooth agreement with the victim, and the suspended execution.