2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

On April 21, 1981, the Plaintiff acquired Class I ordinary driver's license, Class I driver's license on June 8, 1984, and Class I driver's license on June 20, 1984, respectively.

On May 31, 2018, the Plaintiff was given the penalty points of 25 points and 10 points and 120 points, respectively, in violation of the duty of safe driving as of June 21, 2018, and in violation of the duty of safe driving as of November 16, 2018.

On January 17, 2019, the Defendant revoked the Plaintiff’s driver’s license (class 1, class 1, class 1, class 1) on February 18, 2019 as of February 18, 2019 on the ground that the accumulated points of the Plaintiff’s score for one year constitutes at least 121 points, which are the criteria for revocation of the driver’s license.

(이하 ‘이 사건 처분’이라 한다). [인정근거] 다툼 없는 사실, 갑 제1호증, 을 제1, 3, 4호증의 각 기재, 변론 전체의 취지 이 사건 처분의 적법 여부 원고 주장의 요지 원고가 이 사건 처분을 받게 된 결정적인 원인은 2018. 11. 16. 발생한 교통사고로 인한 벌점 부과인데, 위 교통사고는 당시 원고의 차량이 노면의 상태가 고르지 못하고 움푹 파인 지점을 통과하면서 순간적으로 중심이 흐트러져 미끄러지는 과정에서 발생한 것으로 결과적으로 다수의 부상자가 발생하기는 하였으나 이를 전적으로 원고의 책임으로만 볼 수는 없다.

In addition, considering the fact that the Plaintiff purchased and operated dump trucks with large loans in difficult economic circumstances, and the disposition of this case makes it impossible to obtain all revenues from dump trucks due to the instant disposition, and that the Plaintiff’s family members, such as dump trucks and dump trucks that are not able to adapt to Korean life, are suffering from extreme economic suffering, etc., since the disposition of this case is remarkably significant disadvantage that the Plaintiff would suffer compared to the public interest that can be achieved due to the instant disposition, the instant disposition is taken.