Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

At the defendant's office located in B-B building C, the defendant owned 70,000 won in total, such as one computer, one book, and one chair.

D, around January 4, 2018, at the above office, seized the above articles by the original copy of the decision of seizure of corporeal movables, No. 2016, 3354 of the above court, which was entrusted by the creditor E at the above office, and attached a seizure mark thereon.

Nevertheless, around March 2018, the defendant had directors at the above office and concealed the above articles with attachment labeling.

As a result, the defendant has harmed the effectiveness of the attachment indication that public officials performed in relation to their duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Investigation report (to hear statements by a complainant);

1. Reporting on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (Attachment of seized objects kept by a suspect);

1. Relevant Article 140 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;