beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.07.14 2017고단914

사문서위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 27, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seoul Southern District Court, and on August 9, 2011, the Incheon District Court issued a summary order of KRW 4,00,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) with respect to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).

On September 13, 2016, around 01:40 on September 13, 2016, the Defendant driven a 2-car at the D windowatom without a driver’s license, in the 4 KK section from around the commercial influorial main points in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government opened to the front of the C cafeteria located in B in luminous-si, and with approximately 0.085% alcohol concentration in blood.

2. On September 13, 2016, at around 01:49, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) was discovered before the C cafeteria located in B on September 13, 2016; (b) was in front of the luminous Police Station E District F under the influence of drinking to measure drinking; and (c) was identified by the foregoing F on his/her personal information and the name of G, who was asked about his/her personal information from the said F, and the resident registration number of the said G, and was used unlawfully by other persons.

3. The Defendant, at the time, at the place, and as described in paragraph 2, carried as if he were G, and signed in the driver column indicated in the portable information terminal (PDA), and delivered the signature of “G” to the said police officer with the tample.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a private signature, and exercised it by allowing the person in charge of the National Police Agency to reach the name of forgery that could not be known through the Transport Police Computer Network.

4. The Defendant: (a) requested the foregoing police officer to sign on the driver’s sexual name column of the voluntary accompanying consent at the time and place specified in paragraph (2); (b) as described in paragraph (2), the Defendant used the same as G; and (c) stated the “G” and read the Defendant’s unmanned on the next page.