A Imprisonment for 10 months, Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

However, this judgment is delivered to the defendant A.

"2013 Highest 735"

1. On June 28, 2011, Defendant A made a false statement to Defendant A, “A, at the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Hospital, the third floor of J building, the Defendant, “In Korea,” the president of the Victim L Co., Ltd. (former M Co., Ltd.) (hereinafter “K”) in the hospital operated by the Defendant of the third floor of J building, “A would have to repay money within one week if he/she lends money to him/

However, at the time, the Defendant had to pay KRW 150,00,000 per month only with the interest on the above debt, with the personal debt of KRW 100,000,000, and there was no difference in the rent for the hospital building at the time, so there was no intention or ability to pay the said fee even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the above victim as such, and received 100 million won from the victim to the bank account (Account Number:O) in the name of the defendant under the pretext of the loan.

2. On September 201, Defendant B concluded that “A dental hospital operated by the second floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul PP building by the Defendant “K Dental Hospital”, the president of the Victim L Co., Ltd. (former M Co., Ltd.) at the “K Dental Hospital,” which was operated by the Defendant of the second floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul PP building, “A dental hospital operated by the inside and outside of the Republic of Korea, unlike the inside and outside of the Republic of Korea, is highly high-priced machinery equipment and equipment, and there is no difficulty in funding since the monthly sales amount of KRW 3 to 400 million.” On the one-month basis, if the dental hospital borrowed money, it would also repay up to

However, in fact, Defendant B and the individual debt amounted to KRW 00 million, and since all the real estate owned by the Defendant are seized, the financial situation has deteriorated to the extent that employees are unable to pay wages, and even if they borrow money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to repay the debt amount.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim as such and is in Q Q from the victim's position to make a loan.