When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around 16:00 on May 17, 2016, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the Defendant’s injury to the above court No. 2016 High-Ma71 at the Jeju District Court Decision 202, the Jeju District Court, which was in the movement of Jeju Island, at the Jeju Island, at the same time, and asked the defense counsel “I asked the police officer to the effect that it is not close to the danger because the two sections of the police officers were asked about the situation of the ‘at that time, I asked the police officer about how I would have made a statement to the police officer at the site,’ and ‘I asked him about how I would have been present at the site,' and ‘I asked him about how I would have ‘at that time I asked him about how I would have been sworn' and ‘I would like to talk about if I would have asked him about how I would have made an assault' from the defense counsel, and ‘I would like to see the witness from the beginning' and ‘I would like to talk.

However, the defendant responded to the purport that he did not have observed a police officer who was called at the time of the above bodily injury incident, and the police officer returned to the police officer to the effect that he was not a witness, and that he did not directly witness the above fact.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on investigation (to hear statements by a police officer called the scene);

1. Part of the records of trial, such as a investigation report (including a protocol of examination of a witness), the protocol of trial (four times), and the protocol;