[2018 Highest 1232]

1. On May 1, 2018, the Defendant: (a) changed water from “D” restaurant located in Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do; (b) obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force, such as: (c) pushing the victim E, a business owner, in his body; and (d) putting the Defendant out of the restaurant; and (c) breaking the victim E, a business owner, in his body; and (d) putting the Defendant out of the restaurant; and (d) 20 minutes of the above restaurant, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force.

[2018 Highest 1370]

2. On May 15, 2018, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main shop business by force by blocking the entrance of the victim G located in F at the time of 20:30 on May 15, 2018, from the H station operated by the victim G located in F, a bicycle, thereby obstructing the customer from entering the said main shop, and the victim took a bath for the defective victim and blocking the entry of the said main shop for about 20 minutes.

3. On May 16, 2018, the Defendant re-exploited at the same place as above 00:40 on May 16, 2018, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main business by force for about 40 minutes, such as: (a) the victim G and his employees of the said main store; (b) the said main store operator G and I provided “Pa two years”; and (c) all customers who were at the main store to avoid disturbance with their main points.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 Highest 1232]

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second public trial, in the case);

1. Each written statement of E and J;

1. On-site photographs (2018 Height 1370);

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second public trial, in the case);

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the I;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 314 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, Article 50, and the proviso of Article 42 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes reflects his/her mistake and agree with the victims, but the defendant is currently under the suspension of execution due to his/her previous offense and is several times of the same crime.