beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.29 2016고단6259

특수절도등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Joint larceny with B and C;

A. On May 2012, 2012, the Defendant, B, and C conspiredd with the employee of the Fcafeteria of the Victim E’s Operation in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul. The Defendant intruded into B and the above restaurant and then disposed of the goods by using the handcul in order for C to destroy the goods.

On May 2012, the Defendant, along with B and C, opened an entrance and intruded with B, removed 200 micks owned by the victim, which were kept on the second floor of the said restaurant, and C carried the said article out of the knick.

Accordingly, the Defendant, together with B and C, stolen another person's property.

B. On May 2012, 2012, the Defendant, along with a policeman B and C on May 2012, 2012, opened a entrance with B and intruded into the said F cafeteria, the Defendant removed 70 mackers owned by the victim, who was kept on the second cafeteria of the said cafeteria, and C carried the macks in advance.

Accordingly, the Defendant, together with B and C, stolen another person's property.

C. On June 14, 2012, the Defendant, along with B and C around 08:0 on June 14, 2012, opened an entrance and intruded with B, the Defendant: (a) removed 70 plate owned by the victim on the second floor of the said restaurant; (b) removed 4 metal lids in the underground warehouse; (c) removed 3 tablers on the rooftop; and (d) loaded the said article in the handcs prepared in advance.

Accordingly, the Defendant, together with B and C, stolen another person's property.

2. B and B around 16:00 on June 15, 2012, the Defendant was in front of the third floor office of the above F cafeteria, and the Defendant was in front of the entrance, and the Defendant was in front of the entrance, and the Defendant was in front of the entrance, and the Defendant was in front of the entrance, and the Defendant was in front of the entrance.