Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that all of the facts charged in the instant case was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In doing so, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on whether a non-medical person establishes a medical institution prohibited by the Medical Service Act, by misapprehending the legal doctrine on whether a person is a medical institution, by mistake of law,

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.