except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a space between the victim B and the victim from July 2012.

Around 11:00 on October 23, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant, at a national bank located in the military transportation Dong of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of

However, in fact, the defendant was able to enter China with cash 20 million won, and the defendant was thought to enter China, so even if he received money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to conduct his business with the victim.

As above, the Defendant deceiving the victim and received 20 million won in total from the victim, namely, 20 million won cashier’s checks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment of details of deposits and withdrawals by national banks);

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 347 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;