공직선거법위반
All appeals are dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined.
The judgment below
Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the court below is just in maintaining the judgment of the court of first instance that found the Defendants not guilty on the charge of violating the method of distributing the campaign promise collection of the Defendants among the facts charged in the instant case and the violation of the restriction on contribution by the candidates, including Defendant A, on the ground that the case constitutes a crime not committed or a crime is not proven. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence and violating the logical and empirical rules, exceeding the bounds of the principle of logic and experience,
On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed the entire judgment of the court below, but there is no statement in the petition of appeal or the appellate brief concerning the guilty portion of Defendant B.
Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.