On May 21, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud in the support for the development of the Sugwon method, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on September 25, 2015 at Anyang prison.

On June 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 20:00 on June 12, 2016, at the “E” point operated by the victim D located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant issued an order to pay the price, as if he/she would pay the price, and then he/she received, by fraud, the Defendant received, from the injured party, the Plaintiff, and the Defendant received, from the injured party, the 30,500 won of the market price.

"2016 Highest 3233"

1. On April 23, 2016, at around 00:0, the Defendant damaged the G Car Bown, which is owned by the victim F, in which the market price cannot be known as being stopped by one side of the public parking lot located in the Nam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City 1471 without any justifiable reason, due to the following: (a) the Defendant’s destruction of property: (b) the Defendant’s destruction of the G Car Bown, which was driven by drinking by the victim F; (c) the Defendant walk the front driver and the number plate board of the said vehicle; and (d) the Defendant plicked the left-hand part of the said vehicle by plicking and plicking the left-hand part of the said vehicle at hand, thereby causing a defect on the front driver and number plate.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, destroyed F’s car as set out in paragraph 1 at the time and time, and on the ground that the victim H(s) turns 22 years of age, he/she expressed himself/herself, her at one time.

"2016 Highest 3438"

1. On May 29, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s operation of the restaurant for the victim by force for about 30 minutes, such as where the Defendant did not pay the food cost, and the Defendant did not pay the food cost to the J restaurant located in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si I, Seocheon-si, 2016, and the Defendant did not pay the food cost to the Defendant, and the Defendant expressed the victim the complaint with a large amount of 112 report, “I am son who reported this dog to the police, and I am son,” and interfered with the Defendant’s operation of the restaurant by force.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties is called out upon receiving a report on the date, time, and place specified in paragraph 1 and 112.