2. In light of the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant reflects the crime, the fact that there was no punishment history, the degree of damage appears to have been relatively unfilled, and the fact that the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle purchased an automobile comprehensive insurance policy, etc., however, it is difficult to view that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable in light of the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, such as the fact that the nature of the crime is not good in light of the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, and that it appears that the victims could not agree with the victims, and the sentencing conditions indicated in the record, such as the Defendant’s age, occupation, sex, environment, family relationship, etc

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.