A Imprisonment for 8 months, Defendant B’s imprisonment for 6 months, and Defendant C’s fine of 50,000 won, respectively.

Defendant

C.

To the extent that there is no concern about actual disadvantage to the Defendants’ exercise of their right to defense, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy recognized the facts constituting a crime by rhymizing the facts charged. The Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, having the Korea Industrial Technology Promotion Agency as the exclusive institution, carried out “G projects,” which is a project for fostering regional specialized industries aimed at promoting regional economic revitalization, such as fostering regional industries and job creation, from March 2015 to February 2016, with the aim of promoting regional economy, including fostering regional industries, etc., the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy selected the subjects of participation by business entities with fishery resources research institutes of Incheon Metropolitan City as the main institution in charge, and the President of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, upon submitting an application for payment along with relevant documents, shall pay the remainder of the project cost, excluding the private charges,

Defendant

A is the actual representative of I selected as H among the above businesses, and Defendant B is the representative of J, which is a non-profit organization under the jurisdiction of Incheon Metropolitan City, and Defendant C is the actual representative of L who is selected as K among the above businesses.

1. Defendant A and Defendant B’s joint crime refers to the above circumstances with a view to raising KRW 87 million for the participation in the above project. Defendant B prepared funds through Defendant B and paid the above private contributions. On July 2015, Defendant B made documents as if Defendant B had falsely registered Defendant B’s children as the above I employee and paid the payment for M, and accordingly, received subsidies from the State and repaid the above obligations. Defendant B conspired with the M’s passbook and the check card. Defendant B conspired with the above proposal, and conspired with Defendant A to commit a crime by opening the passbook, etc. of the national bank bank in the name of M after Defendant A consented to the above proposal.

Since then, Defendant A had said I on July 2015.