1. On July 2012, the Defendant: (a) received a request from B to “I am employed as the environmental U.S. dollars in the office of the U.S. In response to the request from B at a closed place; and (b) said B “I am employed as the U.S. dollars. if I want to put I am in it as the U.S. dollars.”

On July 2012, the Defendant received KRW 10 million in cash from B in terms of the expenses for personnel solicitation from B’s alleys located in B, Nam-gun, South Korean War.

As a result, the Defendant received KRW 10 million from B under the pretext of solicitation or good offices with respect to cases or affairs handled by public officials.

2. Fraud, Attorney violation of the law (Acceptance received money and valuables in the name of employment solicitation for E) on April 2014, the Defendant issued a false statement to the effect that “I would have a victim E find employment at a non-place located in the Dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Dong-gu, Gwangju, and that “I would have a public official of the Gun Office in the Republic of Korea, who retired from the Republic of Korea, and could be said to be a member of the Gun Office, and on the top of the world, I would like to have a student find as an environment U.S. dollars, and that I would have a student find 20 million won as an environmental U.S. source for the office of the Y-gu, Y-gu.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to have employment as an environmental U.S. source even if he received the money as above in terms of the solicitation cost.

On April 15, 2014, the Defendant received KRW 20 million in cash as expenses for personnel solicitation from the damaged party at H coffee shop located in Gwangju-gu Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu.

As a result, the defendant was ordered to receive KRW 20 million by deceiving the victim under the pretext of solicitation or mediation for cases or affairs handled by public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Part concerning the statement in E in the suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. Statement made by the prosecutor in the protocol concerning B;

1. The termination statement, the loan certificate, the letter, etc. (as indicated in Decision 2) 1.