''

On July 9, 201, when any person was prohibited from wiretappinging telecommunications or recording conversations between others, the Defendant recorded the contents of conversations between D and E using his mobile phone without obtaining the consent of the Defendant’s mobile phone without obtaining the consent of the aforementioned D and E.

Accordingly, the defendant was responsible for the wiretapping of telecommunications between others.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Articles 16(1)1 and 3(1) of the former Protection of Communications Secrets Act (Amended by Act No. 1229, Jan. 14, 2014) concerning criminal facts

1. Four months of imprisonment to be suspended and six months of suspension of qualifications;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence (see, e., Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 59(1)); Article 59(1));