A. On April 1, 2013, the Plaintiff’s agent C entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) that sets forth KRW 1,000,000 as deposit money, and KRW 150,000 as rent monthly (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

However, while entering into the above lease contract, C and the defendant did not enter the contract term in the contract (Evidence A2).

B. On February 3, 2015, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant that the instant lease contract will not be renewed.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 3, purport of whole pleadings

2. Summary of the parties' arguments

A. The Plaintiff’s instant lease contract is a lease with no term of contract specified, and its term of contract is two years. Since the said lease contract expired on or around April 30, 2015, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant building to the Plaintiff at the same time with the payment of KRW 1,00,000 from the Plaintiff.

B. The Defendant agreed to the contract term of the instant lease agreement with Defendant C from April 30, 2013 until the removal of the instant building. As such, the instant lease agreement was not yet terminated.

3. Determination

A. 1) The Defendant asserted that the lease term of this case was set between C and C from April 30, 2013 to the date of removal of the building of this case. However, considering the fact that the contract term is not specified in the written contract (Evidence A2) which is a disposal document, it is insufficient to recognize that there was an agreement between B and C as alleged by the Defendant, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. 2) Ultimately, the lease term of this case is a lease for which the term is not specified, and thus, it is two years in accordance with Article 4(1) of the Housing Lease Protection Act.

B. On April 30, 2015, the instant lease agreement was concluded.