2. In light of the fact that the defendant had been punished several times in the form of an involuntary exploitation even before, and even after having been sentenced to a suspended sentence due to a crime that inflicts an injury on the beneficiary who resisted the forms of an involuntary exploitation, the defendant continues to repeat the crime of an involuntary exploitation even after having been sentenced to a suspended sentence. Even in the case of this case, the defendant committed another crime by conducting a police investigation through a part of the crime on three occasions, etc., even if he committed another crime, it is difficult to expect the effect of the prevention of recidivism, since it is difficult for the defendant to recognize and reflect the crime, it does not seem that the defendant recognized the crime, or that the amount of damage caused by each of the crimes of this case is minor, the fact that the defendant suffers from alcohol existence and mental illness, and that the defendant suffers from mental illness, even if examining other sentencing

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.