A. On March 31, 2017, the Plaintiff, an attorney-at-law, concluded a litigation delegation contract (hereinafter “instant delegation contract”) with the Governor of Jeollabuk-do against the Governor of Jeollabuk-do on March 17, 2017, with respect to the case for which the Governor of Jeollabuk-do seeks revocation of a non-permission of an application for change of the articles of incorporation filed against the Defendant Corporation, which was represented by the representative of the Defendant Corporation B (hereinafter “Defendant Corporation”), and the Defendant C jointly and severally guaranteed the aforementioned obligation of the Defendant Corporation.

Article 6. Sheet repair (1) The defendant corporation shall pay 10 million won (excluding value-added tax) to the plaintiff simultaneously with the conclusion of the delegation contract.

Article 7. Performance Remuneration

(a) When the delegated affairs of contingent remuneration have succeeded to a judgment, judicial or extra-judicial reconciliation (including a decision of recommending reconciliation), mediation (including a decision in lieu of mediation), etc., the contingent remuneration shall be paid in accordance with the following classification:

(1) Where he/she won all or part of the value-added tax (excluding the value-added tax): An amount calculated by calculating the amount by the winning ratio (excluding the value-added tax).

(b) Where it is deemed that he/she won: He/she shall report it to the winning in the following cases, and pay the amount of the contingent remuneration prescribed in the above paragraph (a):

(1) Where a defendant corporation voluntarily waives a claim, withdraws a lawsuit, or withdraws an appeal after the plaintiff puts considerable effort to perform delegated affairs.

C. Of the reasons set forth in subparagraph 1 of the preceding paragraph, the defendant corporation may adjust the contingent remuneration by mutual agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant corporation, taking into account the plaintiff's efforts and the progress of the work when the appeal is withdrawn without any economic benefits or other benefits.

B. In accordance with the instant delegation contract, the Plaintiff, as the legal representative of the Defendant corporation, was the Plaintiff, and was the former Jeju District Court No. 2017Guhap937 (hereinafter “Delegation Cases”) against the Governor of Jeollabuk-do.