A. According to the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1-1 through 13, 2-1 through 8, and 3-1 of the evidence Nos. 1-2, and the whole pleadings, the plaintiff may recognize the fact that the plaintiff lent KRW 93,150,170 to the defendant without fixing the due date for payment as shown in the following table.

대여일 대여금(원) 대여일 대여금(원) 대여일 대여금(원) 2001. 07. 05. 20,000,000 2006. 05. 17. 200,000 2007. 02. 16. 10,000,000 2002. 01. 26. 5,000,000 2006. 07. 05. 7,000,000 2007. 04. 12. 50,000 2002. 04. 24. 1,000,000 2006. 07. 13. 300,000 2007. 04. 27. 100,000 2002. 09. 18. 500,000 2006. 07. 25. 500,000 2007. 06. 13. 100,000 2002. 12. 12. 3,500,000 2006. 09. 19. 200,000 2007. 06. 29. 150,000 2003. 02. 28. 5,000,000 2006. 09. 26. 200,000 2007. 10. 18. 2,000,000 2003. 11. 14. 560,000 2006. 10. 19. 100,000 2007. 11. 01. 10,000,000 2003. 11. 14. 1,900,000 2006. 10. 24. 140,000 2008. 04. 30. 10,000,000 2005. 05. 06. 100,000 2006. 11. 10. 200,000 2008. 04. 30. 5,000,000 2005. 06. 10. 509,000 2007. 02. 02. 100,000 2008. 05. 27. 200,000 2005. 06. 22. 300,000 2007. 02. 06. 500,000 2009. 01. 11. 30,000 2005. 10. 27. 2,000,000 2007. 02. 06. 3,000,000 2010. 04. 01. 511,170 2006. 03. 13. 200,000 2007. 02. 10. 2,000,000 합계 93,150,170

B. The plaintiff asserts that in addition to the above statement money, the defendant lent 90,000 won on Nov. 14, 2003 and 30,000,000 won on Feb. 20, 2007. However, each statement in the evidence Nos. 1-7, 2-5 of the evidence Nos. 1-7, 2-1-7, and 30,000 won to the defendant cannot be deemed to have been lent to the defendant, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise, the plaintiff's assertion in this part is without merit.

In addition, the Plaintiff asserts that from January 3, 2002 to January 30, 2003, the Plaintiff lent the Plaintiff’s credit card to the Defendant and lent KRW 37,393,920 in aggregate of the amount of the Plaintiff’s credit card use and cash service. Thus, according to the evidence No. 4, the Plaintiff during the period from January 3, 2002 to January 30, 203.