In addition, the appeal by the person who requested the attachment order is dismissed.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant’s judgment on the assertion of unfair sentencing recognizes all of the crimes of this case as well as reflects all them, and the Defendant’s failure to have any record of criminal punishment prior to each of the crimes of this case is favorable to the Defendant.

However, the Defendant, in the vicinity of an elementary school, induced a female victim G at the age of 50 to the site of an elementary school and prevented the Defendant from resisting by threatening it by threateninging the said female victim G at the age of 50 to the site of an elementary school, and forced the said victim's sexual organ to be put in the entrance of the said victim as soon as possible, and entices the victim H(202) who is a female juvenile at the age of 14 years who passes through the drone farming road, into a nearby leaving the victim's h (the 2002 h). After inducing the victim's h (the h) to take the humf of the said victim's h (the humf) with his face and humbing his face, and led the victim's h (the humf), a female juvenile at the age of 18, who is a female juvenile at the age of 18, to take advantage of the latter part of the D (the 2000 humf).

In light of the fact that the Defendant committed each sexual crime by committing an unspecified female on the face of life and by inducing the victims to a rare place, each of the instant crimes is committed on three occasions during the period of five years and four months, repeated crimes have been committed on three occasions during the period of five years and four months, each method of crime is very interview and dangerous, and in particular, the degree of each damage suffered by the victim G and D under the age of 18, and the Defendant stated to the effect that “sexual desire and settlement of stress” is the motive of the crime. As such, each of the instant crimes by the Defendant is extremely poor.

The victims are victims.