beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.05.24 2018고정472

업무방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Obstruction of business;

A. On November 29, 2017, from around 04:44 to the same day 04:52 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) on the ground that the Victim E, an employee, was not engaged in personnel affairs in Suwon-si C; and (b) on the ground that the Defendant, within the D convenience store, did not have personnel affairs; (c)

Maburo Oburo, sibly,

The “unfilite gue” and the “competence” were expressed, and the victim’s face was expressed in the calculation unit, and as the victim’s face was expressed in hand, it obstructed the victim’s convenience store work for about 10 minutes by force, such as threatening the victim’s face to hand.

B. On November 30, 2017, from around 08:20 to around 08:30 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s convenience store duties by force, such as: (a) the victim’s vehicle intending to enter the convenience store and purchase the goods, stating that “the victim is unable to sell the goods;” and (b) the victim’s impule, “Pule that is not Chewing, flady,” and intending to take a bath for the victim, and to threaten the victim’s knife, and to remove the goods displayed in the calculation unit, and thereby obstructing the victim’s convenience store duties by force.

2. On November 29, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 04:46, on the ground that the victim E does not engage in personnel management to the above convenience store; (b) took a bath to the victim on the ground that the victim E does not use his/her personal information; and (c) assaulted the victim’s right face one time with his/her left side of drinking.

3. In around November 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) brought an injury to the victim, i.e., “heat in the mouth,” which requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim, by making one-time notification to the victim 112; and (b) taking one-time face of the victim’s right by driving away from his/her own son; and (c) taking one-time care of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Investigation report (CCTV image investigation);

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the treatment of victims' photographs, field photographs, and 112 reported case;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of harm), Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) and Article 260 of the Criminal Act, respectively.