If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On October 11, 2012, at around 21:10, the Defendant: (a) brought an injury to the victim D (the age of 49) on the ground that the Defendant was running tobacco at the bus bus stops located in the front of the Busanbuk-gu C pharmacy; (b) brought an injury, such as flabing and dispute with the victim D (the age of 49) on the ground that the Defendant was flabing tobacco; (c) flabing the victim’s flab, thereby causing the victim to face with the left kne and face where

Summary of Evidence

1. A suspect interrogation protocol of the police officer;

1. Application of investigation reports (general Acts and subordinate statutes);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion regarding the defendant under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and his defense counsel's assertion of the provisional payment order is argued to the effect that the defendant did not assault the victim, and the degree of injury does not correspond to the degree of injury under the Criminal Act, and even if the defendant committed an assault, this constitutes self-defense or a legitimate act. However, considering the evidence, the defendant and the victim can be acknowledged the facts of assaulting the defendant and the victim beyond the floor of bife and biffing, and it can be seen that the defendant and the victim exceeded the floor of bife and biffing with each other. As such, it cannot be said that there is no need for separate treatment because it can be seen that the defendant's act constitutes injury under Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, since the defendant's act appears to constitute self-defense or a legitimate act, it cannot be said that the defendant's act constitutes self-defense.