소유권이전등기
1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.
2. The Defendant indicated in attached Form 10, 11, and 12, among the 3,667 square meters of C forest land in Incheon-si, the Plaintiff.
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation as to this part is as stated in the item of “1. Basic Facts” among the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 2. In full view of the following facts and circumstances, the Plaintiff’s explanation of the ground for claim No. 12-2 and No. 16 of the evidence No. 12-2, the witness of the first instance trial, the witness I testimony of the first instance trial, the expertJ’s appraisal of trees, and the entire purport of the pleading, the Plaintiff was at least 9,000 E-source 8,532 square meters (hereinafter “E land”), and the Plaintiff was at least 10,11,12,13,141,416,717, and the Plaintiff was at least 9,000 square meters of land for landscaping and 19,000 square meters of land for which the Plaintiff had been assigned to the Plaintiff.
“The Plaintiff sold nests (return)” and “the Plaintiff’s visit to the instant land around October 1, 2018, as confirmed.”