특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등
All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because each of the punishments of the court below (three years of imprisonment, two years of imprisonment) against the defendants is too unreasonable
2. In full view of various circumstances, including the fact that Defendant A committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that the criminal records of larceny and quasi-Robbery had reached ten times, and that there had been eight times of criminal records of larceny, and that Defendant B had four times of criminal records of larceny, and that the Defendants committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that all of them were committed during the period of repeated crime due to the same criminal records, and that the quality of the instant crime was poor in light of the applicable law of the instant crime, etc., Defendant A deposited and agreed that the victim H, F, and J in the lower court and the trial.
Even in light of the fact that Defendant B voluntarily surrendered, since the sentence imposed by the lower court appears to be appropriate, the Defendants’ assertion cannot be accepted.
3. Accordingly, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeals are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.