If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

No one shall advertise concerning marriage brokerage without reporting or registering the marriage brokerage business.

Nevertheless, from May 13, 2016 to November 14, 2016, the Defendant, without reporting or registering the marriage brokerage business to the competent authority, placed an advertisement on the marriage brokerage in the advertisement column for the daily newspapers, such as Joseon Dynasty and the Korean Economic Newspapers.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second public trial, in the case);

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to copies of newspaper advertisements;

1. Article 26 (2) 8 and Article 12 (4) of the Act on the Management of Marriage Brokerage Business through which the relevant criminal facts are applicable, and Article 26 (2) 8 and Article 12 (4) of the same Act concerning the selective marriage brokerage business;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, emphasizing that the Defendant had resided in the U.S. at the investigative agency up to the date of the first public trial of this case, and making an advertisement for domestic marriage.

“Incompetiably,” the phrase was inconsistent.

Although the Defendant did not conclude the facts charged on the second trial date, the Defendant still made a proper reflection.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

It seems that the defendant disregards the laws and systems of the Republic of Korea.