However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

(e).

When the Defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to a state of drinking, the Defendant was in a state of drinking so that he was in a state of drinking 2 soldiers exceeding a week, which is a common figure, and Handbags in the drinking house, and the Defendant was unable to memory each of the instant crimes, and the Victim C also stated that “The Defendant was in a state of mental and physical disability at the time of the instant crime in light of the motive of the crime, the background and means of the crime, and the manner of the crime, and the Defendant’s behavior before and after the commission of the crime (Evidence Record 20 pages), etc. (Evidence Record 20 pages), and the Defendant stated that “The Defendant was in a state of mental and physical disability at the time of the instant crime.”

The following crimes have been committed.

1. On November 15, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (accidents, Violence, etc.) continues to make mobile phone calls by getting in the back of the victim C (age 58) at the same university located at the Dong-dong University at the bottom of Busan High-gu, Busan High-ro around 00:20 on November 15, 201

위 피해자가 “살살 좀 이야기 해 주세요. 제가 깜짝 놀랐어요”라고 말을 한 것에 격분하여 손바닥으로 피해자의 오른쪽 뺨과 목덜미 부분을 2~3회 때려 피해자에게 약 14일간의 치료를 요하는 안면부좌상 등 상해를 입게하였다.

2. On November 15, 2014, around 00:30 on November 15, 2014, the Defendant assaulted C of a taxi engineer in front of the F fixed-type and old-age in Busan, Seo-gu.

12 Reported and sent to the site by H(48 years of age) the circumstances leading up to H(48) of the G District District District of the Suan Police Station G District was the Defendant’s assault and the payment of the taxi fare, “Absing the chest of H by hand,” “Absing the chest of H by hand, and walking the left left bucks of H five times due to the outbreak.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers working at 112 patrols.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C and H 1.