When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 06:50, the Defendant: (b) did not look at the victim C (66 years) who was a taxi engineer, before the bus stops in Yeonsu-gu, Yeonsu apartment bus stops located in 232 no. 7, in Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, for the reason that he did not know his horses; (c) the Defendant inflicted the victim’s injury, such as catum salt, etc. which requires treatment for about 21 days, by cutting down the string of the cab that the victim was driven by the driver’s seat of the said cab while getting off the cab and getting off the string of the said cab, and then was skeing the victim’s flaf, and flafed by drinking, and flading the victim’s flaf.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. A photograph of each victim's upper part of the body and a list of reported cases;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, despite the fact that the defendant had been punished several times due to an act of violence, etc. prior to the sentencing, the crime of this case was committed, and the fact that no agreement has been made with the victim, etc., the fact that the defendant deposited 80,000 won for the victim, and that his mistake is divided, etc., under favorable circumstances for the defendant, the defendant shall be considered in light of the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and means of the crime, result, etc., and the decision is made as ordered by the disposition, taking into account all of the sentencing factors shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant'