Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The Defendant is operating a general restaurant in the name of “C” in the Heak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B.

No person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof after cooking shall place a false indication of the place of origin or place a mark likely to cause confusion therewith.

Nevertheless, from January 5, 2014 to January 21, 2014, the Defendant purchased at KRW 158,00 the rice 90 km domestically produced in Cheongju-gu Emart and the rice 80 km with 10 glutinous rice 10 glutinous in Korea, and then falsely marked the origin of rice on the bulletin board for indicating the origin in the above restaurant as domestic products. From January 5, 2014 to January 27, 2014, the Defendant prepared and sold 70 km of the above rice among the above rice to many consumers who found the restaurant and kept in the above restaurant for sale after cooking the rest of 10 km.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A statement of detection;

1. Investigation report (Attachment to a detailed statement of sales of domestic rice);

1. Application of statutes on business registration certificates and business registration certificates;

1. Relevant Articles 15 and 6 (2) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and the Selection of Punishment for Criminal Facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;