1. Around May 14, 2014, the Defendant said that the victim B would pay the price when he/she supplied the fibers to the victim B at the “E” office located in the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Cbuilding D.

However, at the time, the Defendant had been liable to pay a large number of debts, such as other loans for heavy driving capital, at the Industrial Bank of Korea, and because the deficit was accumulated, there was no intention or ability to pay the amount even if the victim was supplied with the original force.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was supplied with the original sum of KRW 42,079,00 from June 25, 2014 to July 28, 2014 by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim.

2. On June 27, 2014, the criminal defendant against the victim F expressed that the victim F would pay the price when he/she delivered the fiber to the victim at the H office operated by the victim F in Scheon-si G.

However, at the time, the Defendant had been liable to pay a large number of debts, such as other loans for heavy driving capital, at the Industrial Bank of Korea, and because the deficit was accumulated, there was no intention or ability to pay the amount even if the victim was supplied with the original force.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was supplied with a sum of KRW 109,318,750 from June 27, 2014 to August 12, 2014, and acquired by deception the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Statement of each police statement related to B and F;

1. The defendant and the defense counsel denied the criminal intent of defraudation in the event that it is difficult to pay the price of goods due to a sudden decline in the exchange rate in around 2014 due to financial difficulties, but they are committed by the victims and the police.