However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The present owner’s building and fire-prevention Defendant is a person operating “E” in Dong-gu, Nam-gu, Dong-gu.

At around 23:00 on July 19, 2016, the Defendant, at the above “E” office, disputed the issue of the Defendant’s wife F and the company operation, and carried out hot water to the Defendant, with oil in transit stored in the above company, and put f with the oil f.

The Defendant, while cutting the oil malle into the office floor while cutting the oil malle into the office floor, putting the light oil male contained therein into the office floor, laid off the light with clothes attached to the clothes, and putting him in mind on the office between B and F on the ground that B had the words straw up in the course of dialogue with F, on the ground that B and F had the words straw up in the course of dialogue with F.

At around 23:05 on the same day, the Defendant discovered light oil from the 23:05 square meters of the total floor area of the cement brick gate and the 160 square meters of the 1st floor of the wall, after attaching the clothes posted on the floor of the above office with a lab with a lab with a lab with a lab and a wall.

Accordingly, the Defendant destroyed part of the first floor of the building that is equivalent to the market price of 8,508,000 won used by a person as a residence.

2. On the same day, the Defendant committed a crime of arsoning the present building, as described in Paragraph 1, and was going forward to the above office at around 23:15 on the same day, the Defendant she saw Ha to mean Ha, a police box affiliated with the 112 police box of the Yandong-dong Police Station that sent out after receiving a 112 report that a fire occurred in the said office as “I am out, I am out, and I am to the police box.” On the ground that H received a request from the police station to undergo a basic investigation, the Defendant she saw Haddd the Hadles of H, and Had the chest of H two times by hand.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in regard to the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the witness F in the court;

1. Each prosecutor's office against the defendant;