일반교통방해 등
All appeals filed by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed.
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. The Defendants (1) are not subject to the crime of interference with business with business by taking into account the following: (a) the amount of damage caused by interference with business is 254,100,000; (b) violence and intimidation is against the officer or employee of the I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “I Co., Ltd”); and (c) the employee is against the I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “I Co., Ltd”); and (d) during the process of urging the I Co., Ltd
(2) The above defendants B and C violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint injury) do not take part in the act of assault against the victim N and their families, and only marithly, the above defendants are prevented to prevent assault against the victim N and their families. According to CCTV images, the defendants B are able to get out of the victim N and her family members' access, and the defendant C can confirm the face that he is able to protect the victim N and her family members' access, and the assault against the victim N and her family members was committed by contingently, the above defendants are not subject to criminal liability by joint principal offenders.
(3) The violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint destruction and damage): ① Collective refusal of transportation is merely based on the local branch's own decision and is not based on the order of the above defendant, the head of the branch, and the above defendant's order. The above defendant urged violent groups to negotiate with I company and cannot be used as a physical and violent means, there is no sign of sending letters and notes that can be mobilized, the defendant's participation in the assembly is participating in the assembly as the head of the higher organization, and the defendant who is the person in charge of the division, takes the lead of the assembly, and takes charge of vehicle control by the speaker, etc., but it is merely done in the course of dissolution of the assembly. In light of the above, the above defendant's criminal liability by joint principal.