On November 28, 2019, at around 15:00, the Defendant had related persons B, who became aware of through smartphone display, engage in commercial sex acts, and had them divide the price for commercial sex acts into the price for commercial sex acts. On the other hand, the Defendant posted an advertisement of commercial sex acts on the Defendant’s cell phone, and posted it on the Defendant’s mobile phone-based marketing “Seoul Stockholm”.

The Defendant introduced C, a male customer, who was found to engage in sexual traffic from a sexual traffic broker who reported and contacted the above advertising writing, and had B receive KRW 1.60,00 won from the Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Del E heading office in return for the price of sexual traffic, and had C sexual intercourse with C.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning B and C;

1. Voluntary report;

1. Reports on internal affairs (to attach letters posted on the Internet advertisement of suspected suspect A) and the advertisement attached thereto;

1. Investigation report (suspect B telephone conversations), investigation report (suspect B telephone statement hearing);

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that even though the defendant arranged sexual traffic at the time and time stated in the facts charged, he did not arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

However, the following circumstances revealed by the evidence revealed above, namely, B had a friendship among the friendships, and B stated that the defendant was aware of the "head of office" as the introduction of such friendships, B had a contact with the defendant prior to the day of the occurrence of the case, "I have been doing work," "I have to talk with the defendant," and "I have to talk with the defendant. I have received a proposal to know sexual traffic, and the defendant has stated that I had engaged in sexual traffic twice through the defendant, and the defendant has stated that I had a sexual traffic twice on the Internet, while posting an advertisement letter about soliciting women to engage in sexual traffic, left their cell phone numbers.