A. The punishment sentenced by the court below (25 years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. The life of the person to be determined is the absolute value of aggression that should be protected in any case, as it cannot be altered only once if it is lost.

Since the murder of such life can not be absolutely accepted for any reason, it is inevitable to punish the corresponding severe punishment.

The crime of this case was committed by the defendant unilaterally by the victim who visited the residence of the defendant for booming activities and provided a gift such as clothes, and thus, the defendant was dissatisfied with the victim's complaint by refusing to provide a sexual intercourse. While the defendant was responding to the victim's demand for return of KRW 1,00,000 to the police due to the reason that the amount of KRW 1,000,000,000 to the victim was not less than the amount required by the victim on the day of the crime of this case, the victim was able to report to the police at the request of return of KRW 1,00,000,000 to the victim. In the course of the physical match, the defendant killed the victim by strokeing the victim, and 1,000,000 won away from the floor during b

In particular, the Defendant: (a) laid the body in seven parts only after the lapse of at least one day from the time of murdering the victim; and (b) laid down the body in a house where human resources would be redeveloped by dividing it into stuffs after sinyl chloride. In light of the Defendant’s behavior, the Defendant did not harm the body in a situation where the body was lost due to satisfying appraisal in the course of murdering the victim; and (c) did so closely and closely to conceal his/her crime.

The victim is from the defendant.