When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a sson who resides in Soyang-gu, Soyang-gu C.

On December 3, 2013, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by making a false statement to the effect that “Esect was sent to F of the staff member of LH Corporation after on-site inspections from the victim E in front of the house managed by LH Corporation.”

The lower part of the facts charged of the instant case (as of December 3, 2013, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by making a false statement to the F of the staff member of LH Corporation after conducting on-site inspection to the effect that “the e-mail was sent in connection with the fire accident that occurred in the mother on the street in the Goyang-gu So-gu, So-gu, So-gu, So-gu, So-called “Syang-gu, So-gu, So-young-gu, E-young.” The lower part of the lower part of the facts charged of the instant case was not recorded in the facts constituting a crime recognized as there is no evidence to acknowledge it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Statement made by witnesses E in the third protocol of the trial;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. The inquiry reply (as of April 15, 2015, the defendant only told F to the effect that "I think one of the two defendants and G people has reached a fire" at the time of the instant case, and argued that there is no performance. However, in full view of the above evidence, it is recognized that the defendant told F as stated in the judgment, and that performance is also recognized in light of the content of the business related to the land of the F or LH Corporation, F and the relationship between the defendant and the victim, and the details of the instant dissemination, and the performance is also recognized in light of the contents of the business related to the land of the F or LH Corporation, the above argument is rejected.

1. Relevant Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall not be less than that of the provisional payment order.