However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 24, 2014, at around 02:20, the Defendant, at the Seoul Western Police Station located in Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 165, submitted to C the following circumstances: (a) the name and resident registration number of F, who was his/her birth, and the statement column of the suspect interrogation protocol prepared by C, for the purpose of hiding the fact that he/she was suspected of assault against D and E and the fine unpaid; and (b) submitted the forged suspect interrogation protocol to C, who was aware of the signature forgery, was bound to file it on the investigation record.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged F’s signature without authority, and exercised the above forged F’s signature.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police and prosecutorial examination of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment of related data, such as suspect A family relation certificate);

1. Article 239 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;