A. On September 8, 2017, the Defendant driven a C-Wing vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”) and proceeds in the speed of the two-lane road from the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the

B. At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff, who was accompanied with the Defendant’s vehicle at the time of the instant accident, was suffering from the injury of “the pellete (closed), scarlete (closed), scarlete, tension, etc.” No. 11 of the chest 12, due to the said accident, and was in effect at E Hospital on August 12, 2017; and on September 13, 2018, the said hospital was in effect “vertebram ebrate from 11st to 1st century.”

C. On May 30, 2018, Daegu District Court rendered a judgment of conviction (six months of imprisonment) against the Defendant on the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) concerning the Accident in the instant case where the Defendant was the Plaintiff, and the Road Traffic Act (Non-licensed Driving) (2017Nodan804), and the Defendant appealed against the above judgment (Tgu District Court 2018No2074) and then dismissed the appeal on June 19, 2018 (Tgu District Court 2018No2074).

[Reasons for Recognition] The entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, a significant fact in this court, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the facts of recognition of the above liability, the defendant, the driver of the defendant vehicle, is a tort, and the plaintiff is the plaintiff due to the accident in this case.