beta
(영문) 창원지방법원밀양지원 2016.04.26 2016가단136

제3자이의

Text

1. The Defendant is based on the authentic copy of the protocol of mediation with executory power of the Changwon District Court 2014Ra683, Changwon Branch of C.

Reasons

1. According to the executory protocol of conciliation, the Defendant: (a) based on the original copy of the Kanwon Branch Branch of Changwon District Court 2014Ddan683, the Defendant: (b) executed seizure of the movable property indicated in the separate sheet as indicated in the attached sheet by the same court; and (c) on June 9, 2015, the said movable property was awarded a successful bid on the same day.

D sold the said movable property to the Plaintiff on June 9, 2015.

However, based on the original copy of the above conciliation protocol, the defendant again executed the attachment of movable property stated in the attached list as the same court 2016 main text4. This is a compulsory execution against movable property owned by the plaintiff, and the judgment like the purport of the claim is sought.

2. Judgment by public notice under applicable Acts (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);